Home » Opinion » Editorials
Local fireworks: Milford says yes, Freedom no
For the first time in a quarter century, residents of Milford will be able to set off fireworks. Well, legally, anyway.
Selectmen revoked the fireworks ban last month, our correspondent Nancy Bean Foster reported. Said Chairman Gary Daniels, “If the government was to try to protect us from everything that would hurt us, we would have no freedom.”
Good for Daniels and the people of Milford, who can finally celebrate the Fourth with a few small pops, sparkles and bangs. Speaking of Freedom, that town is one of many in New Hampshire that still bans the use of fireworks most of the time. Exceptions include nine days surrounding the July 4 holiday and when the Red Sox win the World Series, Foster reported. Seriously.
That a town called Freedom has a general fireworks ban is disappointing. Many New Hampshire towns ban the small, safe fireworks that are permissible in New Hampshire. Fewer should. It’s hard to let freedom ring when your local government will not let you.
READER COMMENTS: 1
- Disengaged: Obama's lousy excuse - 0
- Underestimating NH: Gun control picks two wrong targets - 1
- Roaming jihadis: A terrorist visits Manchester - 0
- Ted Siefer's City Hall: School board on the defensive over Cupcake-gate - 0
- Garry Rayno's State House Dome: All eyes on House as casino vote nears - 0
- 43 killers on lifetime parole - but where? - 0
- Official says NH abortion sites need state scrutiny - 2
- Chechen decries Boston attack - 0
- Heroin use, deaths spike in New Hampshire - 0
Ortiz knocks in six in Red Sox win
UNH Law School grads told to 'serve justice'
Berlin man dies while kayaking
UNH hires firm to redesign one of its logos
Disengaged: Obama's lousy excuse