Home » News » Crime
August 01. 2012 9:12PM
Judge postpones murder trial after defendant's lawyer quits
MANCHESTER — The scheduled Sept. 10 court date for Tony Hebert's second-degree murder trial in Hillsborough County Superior Court North was scrapped Wednesday after his private attorney withdrew from the case for nonpayment of fees.
Hebert, 28, formerly of 692 Rimmon St., is accused of shooting Pablo Samniego, 21, in the face July 17, 2011, at Ferry and South Main streets.
One of the second-degree murder charges accuses Hebert of recklessly causing Samniego's death. The other alleges he knowingly caused Samniego's death.
Police said Samniego was walking with a friend that Saturday morning, just before 3 a.m., when a car pulled up next to them and, after a brief conversation, the man in the car shot Samniego in the face.
Hebert was arrested two days later. A status hearing in the case had been scheduled for Wednesday in Hillsborough County Superior Court North, with a motions hearing set for Aug. 10, in anticipation of the trial starting in September.
But Hebert's attorney, William Sullivan, told Judge David Garfunkel that he hasn't been paid for the past 30 days, despite a contract with Hebert's family, and hasn't been able to resolve the problem.
“Either you're moving to withdraw or you're not,” said Garfunkel, who then said he was granting the withdrawal motion and would appoint a public defender to represent Hebert.
Senior Assistant Attorney General Jeffrey Strelzin said Hebert originally was represented by public defenders Caroline Brown and Eric Raymond. Strelzin said Hebert had objections to Brown and essentially fired her, and that Todd Russell was appointed, but Hebert still wasn't happy and sought the private counsel.
“The defendant was extremely unhappy with his public defenders,” said Strelzin, who asked that contract counsel be appointed to represent Hebert.
Garfunkel said contract counsel — a private attorney contracted to represent defendants financially eligible for public defenders — don't handle murder cases.
Raymond, who was in the courtroom Wednesday, then joined defense and prosecution attorneys in a bench conference, after which Garfunkel told Hebert he was again appointing public defenders to represent him. Garfunkel said the planned Sept. 10 trial date is no longer feasible and asked Hebert to waive his right to a speedy trial, which he did.
Garfunkel said Raymond and Sullivan need to meet and arrange for the transfer of information and materials and that next Friday's planned motions hearing will be a structuring conference.
A new trial date will be set.
Hebert, 28, formerly of 692 Rimmon St., is accused of shooting Pablo Samniego, 21, in the face July 17, 2011, at Ferry and South Main streets.
One of the second-degree murder charges accuses Hebert of recklessly causing Samniego's death. The other alleges he knowingly caused Samniego's death.
Police said Samniego was walking with a friend that Saturday morning, just before 3 a.m., when a car pulled up next to them and, after a brief conversation, the man in the car shot Samniego in the face.
Hebert was arrested two days later. A status hearing in the case had been scheduled for Wednesday in Hillsborough County Superior Court North, with a motions hearing set for Aug. 10, in anticipation of the trial starting in September.
But Hebert's attorney, William Sullivan, told Judge David Garfunkel that he hasn't been paid for the past 30 days, despite a contract with Hebert's family, and hasn't been able to resolve the problem.
“Either you're moving to withdraw or you're not,” said Garfunkel, who then said he was granting the withdrawal motion and would appoint a public defender to represent Hebert.
Senior Assistant Attorney General Jeffrey Strelzin said Hebert originally was represented by public defenders Caroline Brown and Eric Raymond. Strelzin said Hebert had objections to Brown and essentially fired her, and that Todd Russell was appointed, but Hebert still wasn't happy and sought the private counsel.
“The defendant was extremely unhappy with his public defenders,” said Strelzin, who asked that contract counsel be appointed to represent Hebert.
Garfunkel said contract counsel — a private attorney contracted to represent defendants financially eligible for public defenders — don't handle murder cases.
Raymond, who was in the courtroom Wednesday, then joined defense and prosecution attorneys in a bench conference, after which Garfunkel told Hebert he was again appointing public defenders to represent him. Garfunkel said the planned Sept. 10 trial date is no longer feasible and asked Hebert to waive his right to a speedy trial, which he did.
Garfunkel said Raymond and Sullivan need to meet and arrange for the transfer of information and materials and that next Friday's planned motions hearing will be a structuring conference.
A new trial date will be set.
- License revocations for DWI announced - 0
- Manchester murder case remains 'active' - 0
- Manchester man gets federal prison time for mail fraud - 0
- Duo allegedly chased off by Windham neighbor with broom indicted over break-in - 6
- Plea deal expected for man who tried to take officer's gun - 0
- Rochester man facing up to 30 years in prison for brutal assault - 1
- Man who confronts burglar in Nashua gets bit - 0
- Police say Nashua man struck woman with Jeep - 0
- Police seek man they say passed counterfeit bill at Manchester mall - 1
Portsmouth manhunt suspect turns himself in to police
READER COMMENTS: 0- 65 mph OK for E-ZPass drivers with opening of new lanes at Hooksett toll plaza - 0
- Updated: NH Senate kills House-passed gas, tobacco tax hikes - 1
- Senate Finance Committee rejects Medicaid expansion - 10
- Man wielding pipe robs Cumberland Farms in Goffstown - 0
- Buchholz moves to 7-0 as Red Sox post win - 0
- Gambling bill scuttled, 'Now it is going to be really tough' for budget - 29
- NHIAA Roundup: BG girls’ tennis team sweeps Pinkerton - 0
- NHIAA box scores, summaries for May 22 - 0
- Officials say Goffstown High ‘safe’ after threat of violence - 1
White powder in Salem shipping container posed no serious risks
READER COMMENTS: 0- Should applicants for jobless benefits have to pass a drug test?
- Yes
- 78%
- No
- 22%
- Total Votes: 1424





